عبدالمطلب عبداله رهیافت انقلاب اسلامی 2980-9118 19 71 2025 09 21 Sport as an Instrument of Social Control: Analyzing the Regulatory Functions of Sport and the Jurisprudential–Legal Assessment of Article 158 of the Islamic Penal Code of Iran ورزش به مثابه ابزار کنترل اجتماعی: تبیین کارکردهای فقهی-حقوقی ماده ۱۵۸ قانون مجازات اسلامی 99 124 232060 FA محمدرضا جلیلی دانشجوی دکتری گروه فقه ومبانی حقوق اسلامی دانشگاه پیام نور،تهران،ایران سیدمحمد صدری دانشیار گروه آموزشی فقه ومبانی حقوق اسلامی دانشگاه پیام نور،تهران،ایران محمدصادق جمشیدی راد دانشیار گروه آموزشی فقه ومبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشگاه پیام نور،تهران،ایران حیدر امیرپور دانشیار گروه آموزشی فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران Journal Article 2025 02 08 This study explores sport as a mechanism of social control and its legal implications under Iranian law, focusing on the jurisprudential and legal analysis of Clause (th) of Article 158 of the Islamic Penal Code. From a sociological perspective, sport contributes to the internalization of norms, emotional regulation, and collective solidarity, functioning as an informal institution that reinforces social order. Legally, however, sports-related incidents raise complex issues concerning civil and criminal liability. Employing a descriptive–analytical method and library-based data collection, the research investigates how Article 158 delineates the boundary between lawful sports conduct and criminal behavior. The findings reveal that while the Article excludes sports-related injuries from criminal liability if rules are observed and religious principles are not violated, civil liability may persist unless informed consent and risk acceptance are proven. Comparative analysis with Canadian law highlights that the “assumption of risk” doctrine operates as an independent defense in common law, whereas in Iran, similar effects derive from Islamic legal principles such as idhn (permission) and iqdam (voluntary action). The study concludes that sport functions as both a field of moral education and a component of Iran’s criminal policy, demanding more consistent judicial interpretation and clearer legal guidelines to balance freedom, responsibility, and social order. Introduction In modern societies, sport has evolved from a recreational activity into a vital instrument of social control and normative regulation. It cultivates discipline, respect for authority, and lawful behavior—qualities essential for the maintenance of social order. In Iran, where the interaction between law, religion, and social norms is deeply intertwined, sport operates not only as a cultural phenomenon but also as a legally regulated activity. The study explores how Iranian law—especially Clause (th) of Article 158 of the Islamic Penal Code (2013)—reconciles the social value of sport with its potential for physical harm.Article 158 explicitly states that sports-related acts do not constitute crimes if performed according to the rules of the sport and not in contradiction with Islamic norms. This clause reflects Iran’s broader criminal policy to prevent over-criminalization while recognizing the educational and disciplinary roles of sport. The research thus investigates sport simultaneously as a social regulator and a legally framed field, bridging sociology, jurisprudence, and law. Materials and Methods The research employs a descriptive–analytical method based on library and documentary sources. Primary legal texts—such as the Islamic Penal Code (2013), the Civil Liability Act (1959), and constitutional provisions on physical education—form the core legal framework. Jurisprudential sources, including discussions on idhn (permission), iqdam (voluntary exposure to risk), and la darar (no harm), are analyzed to identify Islamic foundations relevant to sports liability. Complementary sociological theories by Coakley (2017), Bourdieu (1990), and Hirschi (2017) provide conceptual grounding for understanding sport as a form of normative and emotional regulation. Comparative analysis draws upon foreign legal systems, particularly Canadian and British case law, where the “assumption of risk” doctrine functions as a distinct exculpatory defense. Iranian and comparative studies—such as those by Safaei (2024), Hosseini & Eshaqi (2015), and Hajizadeh & Shadmani (2021)—inform the contextual and doctrinal evaluation. This interdisciplinary method allows the research to connect three analytical levels: (1) sport as a mechanism of informal social control; (2) sport as a reflection of Islamic jurisprudential reasoning; and (3) sport as a component of Iran’s criminal policy framework. Discussion Sport serves as a social regulator, channeling individual energies into structured, rule-bound activities that encourage self-discipline and lawful behavior. Through training and competition, athletes internalize social values such as fairness, respect for authority, and cooperation. From a sociological viewpoint, this aligns with Hirschi’s social bond theory, which identifies attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief as key elements binding individuals to social order. However, the same activities often lead to physical injuries, raising questions about legal responsibility. Article 158 of Iran’s Penal Code provides a nuanced legal mechanism: sports-related injuries are not crimes if caused during lawful, rule-based conduct consistent with Islamic norms. Yet, when negligence, excessive force, or violation of technical regulations occurs, both criminal and civil liability may apply. This legal duality demonstrates the balance between freedom of athletic activity and the protection of bodily integrity. From a jurisprudential perspective, three Islamic legal principles underpin this approach: 1. Idhn (Permission): When an individual willingly participates in an activity with inherent risks—such as sports—their consent can negate the criminal liability of others, provided the act remains within lawful boundaries. 2. Iqdam (Voluntary Exposure to Risk): A person who knowingly exposes themselves to a potential harm may be precluded from claiming compensation unless misconduct or excessive deviation is proven. 3. La darar (No Harm): If the act exceeds ordinary risk or involves negligence, compensation becomes obligatory, reaffirming the protection of human integrity in Islamic law. This tripartite framework mirrors the Western notion of “assumption of risk,” but is rooted in indigenous Islamic reasoning. It supports the moral legitimacy of sport while ensuring accountability.Beyond doctrinal law, sport functions as an element of Iran’s criminal policy—a preventive, educational, and rehabilitative instrument. The Penal Code’s approach to sport demonstrates a shift from punitive to normative regulation, consistent with global trends emphasizing restorative and educational justice. The field of sport thus becomes a microcosm of lawful social behavior, where respect for rules substitutes’ coercion with self-control.At the institutional level, the legal recognition of sport’s autonomy under Article 158 reduces unnecessary judicial intervention, strengthening the internal disciplinary systems of sports federations. Yet, inconsistencies in judicial interpretation and lack of specialized training for judges and referees remain major challenges. The analysis of Iranian court decisions reveals divergent applications of Article 158—sometimes overly expansive, other times restrictive—indicating the need for procedural guidelines and clearer definitions of “lawful sport behavior. “Moreover, the legal responsibility of referees, coaches, and sports organizations extends beyond the athletes themselves. Negligence in enforcing rules, providing proper equipment, or ensuring safety may lead to civil liability under the 1959 Civil Liability Act. Likewise, the malfunction of sports facilities or improper medical supervision can constitute grounds for compensation. This interconnected web of responsibilities transforms the sports field into a system of shared governance—an institutionalized form of social control integrating legal, moral, and technical norms. Conclusion This study demonstrates that sport in the Islamic Republic of Iran operates simultaneously as a social institution, a juridical domain, and a component of criminal policy. Clause (th) of Article 158 of the Islamic Penal Code crystallizes this duality by exempting lawful sports acts from criminalization while maintaining conditions of accountability. Rooted in both Islamic jurisprudence and modern legal principles, the Article encapsulates a hybrid model of social regulation where freedom and responsibility coexist. Sport thus contributes to national criminal policy not merely by preventing deviance but by cultivating a disciplined, law-abiding citizenry. It serves as a field for translating abstract legal and moral norms into embodied practice—where respect for rules, fairness, and moderation are learned experientially. Nevertheless, persistent challenges—including inconsistent case law, insufficient legal training for sports officials, and the absence of specialized sports liability codes—limit the Article’s effectiveness. Legislative reforms should clarify the scope of lawful conduct, define standards for negligence, and institutionalize legal education for coaches, referees, and judges. In the broader perspective, integrating sociological theories of control with Islamic jurisprudence enables a richer understanding of how law and sport mutually reinforce social order. Article 158, therefore, is not merely a technical legal clause but a cornerstone of Iran’s hybrid governance model—where law, morality, and sport converge to foster a disciplined and cohesive society. این پژوهش به بررسی نقش نظم‌بخش و کارکردهای کنترل اجتماعی ورزش با تکیه بر تحلیل فقهی-حقوقی بند «ث» ماده ۱۵۸ قانون مجازات اسلامی می‌پردازد. از یک‌سو، ورزش به عنوان پدیده‌ای اجتماعی، نقشی مؤثر در بازتولید نظم، هنجارسازی و پیشگیری از انحراف اجتماعی ایفا می‌کند و از سوی دیگر، حوادث ناشی از آن در چارچوب قواعد حقوق کیفری و مدنی نیازمند تحلیل‌های دقیق است. در این راستا، پژوهش حاضر با روش توصیفی-تحلیلی و بهره‌گیری از منابع کتابخانه‌ای، تلاش دارد ضمن تبیین کارکردهای اجتماعی و حقوقی ورزش، مبانی مسئولیت کیفری و مدنی ناشی از فعالیت‌های ورزشی را در نظام حقوقی ایران، با تأکید بر ماده ۱۵۸ قانون مجازات اسلامی، مورد بررسی قرار دهد. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که اگرچه ماده یادشده در موارد خاص، مسئولیت کیفری را منتفی می‌داند، اما مسئولیت مدنی همچنان پابرجا می‌ماند؛ مگر در شرایطی که عنصر رضایت و پذیرش خطر از سوی ورزشکار ثابت شود. این پژوهش بر ضرورت شناسایی جایگاه ورزش در نظام نظم اجتماعی، تدوین قواعد روشن‌تری برای تشخیص مسئولیت، و تبیین رویه قضایی منسجم در این زمینه تأکید دارد.

https://www.rahyaftjournal.ir/article_232060_ae6c736f1024b825a56d51989be2debd.pdf