The Islamic Revolution Approach

The Islamic Revolution Approach

Investigating the privatization process of Government-owned Companies after the Islamic Revolution In order to provide an optimal model with a real options approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Masoumeh Ataalahi 1
Hamidreza Kordlouie 2
Mohsen Sigholi 3
Fereydoun Rahnamae Rudposhti 4
1 PhD Student in Financial Management, Department of Financial Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran) Corresponding Author)
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Financial Management, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
4 Professor, Department of Financial Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
The present study optimizes the privatization process in the years after the Islamic Revolution of Iran according to the type of real options. In recent years, privatization in Iran has not achieved the desired result. Considering the effect of privatization on the financial performance of Government-owned Companies before and after privatization, what is clear is that the share income of companies and the return on assets and capital of companies have not changed after privatization and in general the performance of companies has not changed after privatization. In this research, the study method was performed qualitatively. In this way, by interviewing financial experts and executives of Government-owned Companies, interviews were conducted and the results of the interviews were analyzed using MAXQDA 2020 software and coding was done. The most important findings of the research show that due to the dynamics of the conditions governing economic and financial activities and consequently increasing the risk of decision-making in the field of investment, we need more advanced valuation methods that can provide more information than traditional methods. Therefore, the method of real options was used as a complementary method along with traditional valuation. Types of real options used in Government-owned Companies, including expansion or abandonment of the project, and large project managers cannot easily exercise the authority to abandon or expand due to uncertainty. Therefore, the most important components influencing the choice of real options are the value of the company, uncertainty (return fluctuations) and investment costs and denoted price. The results show that the use of the above method shows valuable information from different dimensions of risk and its effect on the financial justification of many strategic decisions of firms at any given time. The results of evaluating the traditional method with the real options method indicate that the net value obtained from the real options approach is higher than the traditional method.
Keywords
privatization
evaluation
model explanation
real options
خنیفر، حسین ( 1395) اصول و مبانی روش های پژوهش کیفی، انتشارات ، نگاه دانش 50-94 
رهنمای رودپشتی ،فریدون،و جودلایی( 1395)، تبیین رابطه بازدهی و نوسان همزمان بازدهی سهام با استفاده از الگوی اختیارات سرمایه­گذاری، دانش مالی تحلیل اوراق بهادار 59-65
رهنمای رودپشتی ،فریدون ،و سروشیار( 1392 ) ارزیابی مقایسه‎ای توانمندی معیارهای عملکرد اقتصادی و حسابداری در تبیین ارزش شرکت‎های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران،تحقیقات مالی دانشگاه تهران
مدرس ، محمد و قاسمی، مهدی ،( 1392) توسعه و تحلیل سرمایه گذاری با استفاده از روش اختیار معامله حقیقی و کاربرد آن در ارزیابی یک محصول شیمیایی ، نهمین کنفرانس بین المللی مهندسی صنایع
منابع لاتین
Andalib ,M (2018)  Modeling managerial behavior in real options valuation for project-based environments, Journal of project management
Boudlaie , H ( 1397) A Qualitative Study of Customer Experience in Retail Industry, Ebsco, Google Scholar, ISC, Doaj, Ulrich
Copeland and V. Antikarov, Real Options: A Practitioners Guide, New Yark: Texere, 2003.
Cotter, J. F., Marcum, B., Martin, D. R., 2003. A cure for outdated capital budgeting techniques.Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance
Guj, P., 2013. Mineral economics: Australian and global perspectives. The Australasian Instituteof Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne, Ch. Mineral project evaluation: Financial modelling anddiscounted cash flow (DCF) analysis
Dixit, AK., and RS. Pindyck. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press.
Khan shafigh sara, (2017) Examining Real Options Exercise Decisions in Information Technology Investments, AIS journal,Vol 18
Kodukula, P., and PMP. CH. Papudesu. (2006). Project Valuation Using Real Options, Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data, J.Ross publisher.
Khanifer ,H , 1395, Principles and methods in qualitative research, Negah danesh ( in Persian)
Martinez, E.A., and J. Mutale. (2011). “Application of an Advanced Real Options Approach for Renewable Energy Generation Projects Planning.” Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
McDonald, R. and D. Siegel .(2006). “Option Pricing When the Underlying Asset Earns a Below-equilibrium Rate of Return: A Note,”. Journal of Finance, 39(1), 261-65.
Sheen, J. N. (2005). Fuzzy financial profitability analyses of demand side management alternatives from participant perspective. Journal of Information Sciences
Shiu-Hwei Ho (2011). A fuzzy real option approach for investment project valuation, Journal of Expert Systems with Applications
Shun-Chung Lee. (2010). Using real option analysis for highly uncertain technology investments: The case of wind energy technology, Journal of Renewable and sustainable Energy Reviews.
SupratimDas Gupta (2021) Using real options to value capacity additions and investment expenditures in renewable energies in India. Energy Policy Volume 148
Trigeorgis ,L (2017),   Real Options in Operations Research, Journal of European Journal of Operational Research