Humans, being civil by nature, have been looking for a way to organize social life since the beginning of their civilization, and therefore, have pursued state-building. But as much as the state can provide public good, it can also have some disadvantages and disadvantages, and for this purpose, tools must be provided to monitor and control it. In this regard, the main question of this article is what is the role of the Administrative Court of Justice in monitoring power in the Islamic government and how can this monitoring lead to ensuring administrative justice and controlling power? The research hypothesis is that the Administrative Court of Justice, based on principles 170 and 173 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran and on the basis of monitoring the decisions and actions of government institutions, is an effective tool for ensuring administrative justice and preventing the concentration and abuse of power in the Islamic government. The research findings have shown that since the principle in the Islamic government is justice and the rights of citizens, therefore, the tools for establishing justice are also embedded in the legal structure of the constitution, including the Administrative Court of Justice, so that citizens can exercise their rights in the administrative affairs of the country through it. The public law research approach and data collection method have been library and documentary.
Introduction
In Islamic governance, the concept of power oversight is crucial for maintaining the balance between authority and citizen rights. This study centers on the Administrative Justice Tribunal of Iran, an essential body responsible for overseeing governmental decisions and ensuring they adhere to Islamic principles and constitutional mandates.
Main Body
The tribunal's role in Islamic governance is multifaceted, focusing on safeguarding public interests and preventing misuse of power. The research delves into various cases where the tribunal has intervened to rectify government actions that breached legal and ethical standards. This oversight is instrumental in fostering a climate of accountability and transparency within the government.
Key aspects of the tribunal's functions include:

Legal Oversight: Examining how the tribunal reviews administrative decisions to ensure they comply with both Sharia law and the Iranian Constitution.
Ethical Oversight: The tribunal also plays a critical role in upholding the ethical standards expected of public officials, emphasizing the Islamic governance principle of 'Adl (justice).
Public Trust and Legitimacy: By effectively addressing grievances against administrative injustices, the tribunal enhances public trust and the legitimacy of the governance system.

Furthermore, the study incorporates a comparative analysis with similar institutions in other Islamic countries, providing a broader perspective on the effectiveness of such oversight mechanisms. This comparison highlights the unique aspects of the Iranian model and its impact on governance and public administration.
Conclusion
The findings from this study underline the significant impact of the Administrative Justice Tribunal in enforcing accountability and legal conformity in governmental actions. It underscores the necessity of robust oversight mechanisms in Islamic governance, which not only ensure adherence to legal standards but also promote a just and ethical administration.
This comprehensive analysis of the Administrative Justice Tribunal illustrates its critical role in the broader context of Islamic governance, offering insights into the dynamics of power and accountability in a religiously-informed legal framework. The study's implications are valuable for policymakers, scholars, and practitioners involved in governance and administrative justice in Islamic contexts.