The Islamic Revolution Approach

The Islamic Revolution Approach

The requirements of citizenship rights in the fourth decade of the Islamic Revolution in the light of the role of custom with emphasis on the views of Imam Khomeini (RA)

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Assistant professor, member of the faculty of Islamic Jurisprudence and Law, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Introduction

Citizenship rights are an important and influential issue in the contemporary world, which has different dimensions. In this context, the laws of the countries on the one hand and international documents in the form of human rights issues on the other hand, try to regulate the rights and needs of people in different societies without considering ethnic, racial, religious and linguistic considerations. give In the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, although it is not explicitly mentioned under the title of citizenship rights, there are clear signs of recognition of the nation's rights, including the right to freedom of speech, assembly, participation, and the right to self-determination, equality, and justice. Covers In addition, in the opinions of the founder of the Islamic Revolution of Iran, various aspects of citizenship rights have been proposed based on religious and jurisprudential attitudes, which require a detailed explanation and recognition in the light of contemporary developments and conditions. Considering the importance of the nation's rights in the eyes of Imam Khomeini (RA) and internal laws, including the constitution, the discussion of citizenship rights or the nation's rights is an obvious necessity for the political system of the Islamic Republic of Iran in different periods, including the fourth period of the Islamic Revolution. In the present research, the aim is that citizenship rights, in addition to requiring changes in the light of time changes and along with political and social requirements, require adherence to fundamental principles that can protect the rights of citizens in any situation, without ethnic considerations. , support linguistic, sexual, racial or extra-legal matters. Therefore, one of the requirements of citizenship rights is to rely on principles and rules that provide the ability to transform into inclusive, comprehensive and at the same time diverse laws for pluralistic societies such as Iran. From another point of view, it should be said that the analysis of the state of citizenship rights in the fourth decade of the Islamic Revolution can make it possible for policy makers and educational, legal, legal and media practitioners to provide conditions to shed light on previous weaknesses. , the damages related to the realization of citizenship rights should be removed and the ground should be provided for possible revisions in future decisions and plans. In addition, what is mentioned today under the title of "public good" is beyond the various dimensions of citizenship rights, which can be considered as a framework for identifying examples of citizenship rights and their plan for the fourth decade of the Islamic Revolution.

Research background Ramezanipour and Ismaili (2019) in the article "The position of citizenship rights in the political style of Imam Khomeini (RA) and Ayatollah Khamenei, focusing on the three components of the right to freedom of speech and opinion, the right to participate in determining one's destiny, and the right to party and organize They concluded that the view and action of Imam Khomeini (RA) is a value view based on freedom of thought and action. Also, Ayatollah Khamenei has considered civilization to be impossible without freedom of thought. The discussion of maximum participation in practice has been emphasized by both cases. Afshar Ahmadi et al.'s article (2017) entitled "Individual rights of citizenship in the Islamic Republic of Iran with the jurisprudential approach of Imam Khomeini (RA)" has stated that individual human rights including the right to self, recognition and realizing the true position of the individual as Ashraf al-Kharqat, and also by referring to verses and traditions, recognizes the rights and property of citizens in the society as the foundation of the system of citizenship rights in his jurisprudence. Ansari and Nazari (2014) in the article "Basics and principles of citizenship rights in the thought of Imam Khomeini (pbuh) and its differences with citizenship rights in the West" pointed out some differences that are specific in the opinions of Imam Khomeini (pbuh) Achieving basic freedoms by considering the right to good and forbidding evil as a universal duty (extreme freedom), active and effective participation of women (against extreme feminism), paying attention to the rights of ethnic, racial and religious minorities. Oppression of minorities in the West) and attention to virtue-based citizenship training (against superficial citizenship in the West only for participation) are mentioned. Mousavi Bejnvardi and Mehrizi Thani (2013) in the article "Citizenship Rights from the perspective of Imam Khomeini (PBUH)" stated that the theoretical approach of Imam Khomeini (PBUH) is based on the rights of the Ummah. His vision is based on rights-oriented and giving importance to citizenship rights including freedom, justice and security and the rights derived from them. Therefore, creating a discourse around their opinions is one of the main foundations of citizenship rights in the Islamic system.
Research method

Descriptive and analytical methods and library tools are used in this article. The theoretical framework of the article is also in line with the topic of the current discussion, public good.

The final result

Analytical framework of the public good, referring to the requirements of citizenship rights for the fourth decade of the Islamic Revolution, shows that Imam Khomeini's opinions also pay attention to the elements of freedom of expression, political participation, the right to self-determination, expression of opinions and beliefs within the framework of the law, and protection of privacy. It has paid attention to the privacy of individuals as well as the responsibility of citizens towards building society. Therefore, it should be said that rights and obligations are inseparable elements of citizenship rights, which need more clarification in the fourth decade of the revolution. However, inferring from the opinions of Imam Khomeini (RA) and in the light of the principle of public good, it should be said that the establishment of a national institution of citizenship rights by using the role of customs in determining the examples of citizenship rights and re-reading the principles and foundations of citizenship rights based on the constitution and principles 24 to 26 of the Constitution or the principle of the nation's sovereignty, etc., will be the ways to present a model of Islamic citizenship. In fact, the "rights of the nation" should be considered the heart of the constitution and should be considered even in possible changes to the constitution and other laws. The crystallization of these fundamental rights in the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran is a clear sign of the manifestation of "dignity-based governance" and "righteous governance", the elements and requirements of which are expressed in the opinions of Imam Khomeini (RA) and require explanation and explanation based on his wishes. Changeable citizens.
Keywords

قرآن کریم.
افشار احمدی، ایرج، روحانی مقدم، محمدصادق، آقایی بجستانی، مریم (1397)، حقوق فردی شهروندی در جمهوری اسلامی ایران با رویکرد فقهی امام خمینی (ره)، مجله اخلاق زیستی، ویژه نامه حقوق شهروندی، صص 29-17.
انصاری، منصور، نظری، محمدعلی (1394)، مبانی و اصول حقوق شهروندی در اندیشه امام خمینی (س) و تفاوت­های آن با حقوق شهروندی در غرب، فصلنامه اندیشه سیاسی در اسلام، شماره 4، صص 27-1.
آبادی­زاده، فریبا، آل­بویه، علی، امیرپور، حیدر (1401)، بررسی تطبیقی مفهوم آزادی در اندیشه امام خمینی و آیزایا برلین با تأکید بر اصاله البرائه، فصلنامه رهیافت انقلاب اسلامی، سال شانزدهم، شماره 61، صص 62-45.
بشیریه، حسین (1386)، عقل در سیاست، سی­وپنج گفتار در فلسفه­سیاسی، جامعه­شناسی و توسعه­سیاسی، تهران: نشر نگاه­معاصر.
پیروزی، عبدالله، الله­کرم، عبدالحسین، بخشایشی­اردستانی، احمد، امینی، علی­اکبر(1400)، مطالعه تطبیقی مفهوم خیر عمومی در اندیشه سیاسی امام خمینی(ره) و آیت­الله نائینی،فصلنامه توسعه­اجتماعی، دوره16، شماره اول،صص24-1.
جوادی آملی، عبدالله (1384)، آزادی بیان، مجله پاسدار اسلام، شماره 283.
جوزانی نیکو بخشایشی ، احمد.(1396). مطالعه تطبیقی میزان تحقق اندیشه امام خمینی (ره) با رویکرد عدالت اقتصادی در دولت­های پس از انقلاب(1392-1368). فصلنامه پژوهشهای سیاسی جهان اسلام، دوره7، شماره دوم،صص 79-57.
دارستانی فراهانی، سعید، توانایی، محمدحسین، اکبری دستک، فیض­الله (1398)، نسبت سنجی مفهوم علم در امام مبین و نظریه ولایت فقیه امام خمینی (ره)، فصلنامه رهیافت انقلاب اسلامی، سال 17،شماره 62، صص126-107. 
درخشه، جلال؛ فخاری، مرتضی.(1395). گستره مفهوم عدالت در اندیشه امام خمینی، فصلنامه پژوهشنامه انقلاب اسلامی، دوره ششم، شماره 18، صص 18-1.
درخشه، حسین، درخشه، جلال (1400)، تحلیل مفهومی خیر عمومی و برساخت آن در اندیشه سیاسی یورگن هابرماس، فصلنامه سیاست، دوره51، شماره اول، صص 179-153.
راولز،جان (1385)، عدالت به مثابه انصاف: یک بازگویی، ترجمه: عرفان ثابتی، چاپ دوم: تهران: ققنوس.
رمضانی­پور، حسین، اسماعیلی، محسن (1399)، جایگاه حقوق شهروندی در سبک سیاسی امام خمینی (ره) و آیت­الله خامنه­ای با تمرکز بر سه مؤلفه حق آزادی بیان و عقیده، حق مشارکت در تعیین سرنوشت و حق تحزب و تشکل، فصلنامه جامعه شناسی سیاسی ایران، سال سوم، شماره چهارم، صص 30-1.
کوچک زاده ، فرهاد.(1398).دین و نگاه دینی امام خمینی(ره) به عنوان رهبر جامعه اسلامی از مقوله فساد، نشریه بصیرت: صص 33-16.
گای، ماری (1391)، شهروندی در تاریخ اندیشه غرب، ترجمه عباس باقری، تهران: نشر فرزان روز.
مصباح یزدی، محمدتقی (1388)، نگاهی گذرا به نظریه ولایت فقیه، تهران: انتشارات مؤسسه آموزشی و پژوهشی امام خمینی (ره).
مقصودی، رضا، محقق­داماد، سیدمصطفی، علامه، سیدمهدی، مظلوم رهنی، علیرضا، اسدی کوه­باد، هرمز (1400)، اعتبار و کارآیی شرط بنائی در فقه امامیه و حقوق مدنی ایران، فصلنامه فقه و اصول، سال 54، شماره2، صص 156-137.
ملک­زاده، فهیمه، احمدلو، مونا (1391)، جایگاه عرف در حقوق با رویکردی بر اندیشه­های امام خمینی (ره)، پژوهشنامه متین، سال چهاردهم، شماره 56، صص 163-139.
موسوی خمینی، روح الله (1360)، کشف الاسرار، بی جا: نشر فلق.
موسوی خمینی، روح الله (1378)، صحیفه امام، تهران: مؤسسه تنظیم و نشر آثار امام خمینی (ره).
موسوی خمینی، روح الله (1381)، ولایت فقیه (حکومت اسلامی)، تهران: مؤسسه تنظیم و نشر آثار امام خمینی (ره).
موسوی خمینی، سید روح الله. (ب1382) کلمات قصار: پندها و حکمت، تهران: مؤسسه تنظیم و نشر آثار امام خمینی.
موسوی خمینی، سید روح­الله (1376)، اجتهاد و تقلید، تهران: مؤسسه تنظیم و نشر آثار امام خمینی (ره).
موسوی خمینی، سید روح­الله (1391)، جهاد اکبر، تهران: انتشارات مؤسسه تنظیم و نشر آثار امام خمینی.
میرتقی، مصطفی (1371)، شرحی بر رساله حقوق حضرت امام سجاد (ع)، قم: نشر مشهور.
نش، کیت (1389)، جامعه­شناسی سیاسی معاصر، جهانی شدن قدرت و سیاست، ترجمه محمدتقی دلفروز، تهران: انتشارات کویر.
هابرماس، یورگن (1392)، دگرگونی ساختاری حوزه عمومی، ترجمه جمال محمدی، تهران: نشر افکار.
منابع انگلیسی
Nozick, Robert(1974), anarchy, state and utopia, basil Blackwell, oxford.
Opwis F. (2013) “Public Interest”. In: Bowering G. (ed.) The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
Salvatore, Armando and Dale F. Eickelman, eds. (2004) Public Islam and the Common Good. Leiden: Brill.
Yuengert, Andrew. ( 2009) “The Common Good for Economists,” Faith and Economics 38: 1-9.
Zaman M.Q. (2004) “The Ulama of Contemporary Islam and Their Conception of the Common Good”. In: Salvatore A. and Eickelrnan D.F. (eds) Public Islam and the Common Good. Leiden: Brill, pp. 129–156.
 
 
.