The Islamic Revolution Approach

The Islamic Revolution Approach

The Fragile State of Afghanistan and Its Security Threats to the Islamic Republic of Iran (Focusing on the Time Period from 2021 Onwards)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD Student in International Law, Shahid Beheshti University
2 Associate Professor of Law Faculty of Shahid Beheshti University
Abstract
Afghanistan must be considered one of the most important countries with a fragile government in today's world. A country under Taliban rule with specific ideologies and actions has become a source of numerous security, economic, and socio-political threats both domestically and internationally. Iran, with its long shared borders, has been on the front lines facing the consequences of Afghanistan's government inefficacy and fragility for several decades. With this in mind, the current article, focusing on the security impacts of this country on the Islamic Republic of Iran, seeks to answer the question: What threats and security challenges has the fragile state of Afghanistan caused for the Islamic Republic of Iran following the Taliban's return to power, and what solutions exist to mitigate these threats? In response to this question, it must be hypothesized that the fragile and unstable situation of the Afghan government under Taliban rule in managing and solving its challenges has led to threats such as Taliban behavior towards Afghan Shiites, ethnocentric and exclusive approaches in forming the government, the expansion of terrorist activities, securing borders, irregular migration of Afghan migrants, issues regarding the water rights of the Helmand River, and drug trafficking as the most significant security threats to Iran from Afghanistan. The research findings affirm that the presence of these challenges as security threats to Iran is acknowledged, and intervention by international organizations along with the cooperation of neighboring countries of Afghanistan and extra-regional powers to enhance the efficacy and power of the state in Afghanistan within the framework of the Responsibility to Protect doctrine could reduce the effects of these security threats for Iran. The current research is based on a descriptive-analytical method, and its data has been collected through library resources.
Introduction
The transition of power in Afghanistan has led to significant changes in its governance structure, with the Taliban assuming control. This study evaluates the resulting state of governance, focusing on the aspects of political instability and weak state capacity that threaten both internal security and developmental prospects.
Main Body
Since the Taliban's takeover, Afghanistan has faced numerous governance challenges, including a lack of international recognition and internal legitimacy. The research highlights key areas where governance has faltered, particularly in ensuring security, providing basic services, and maintaining economic stability.

Security Challenges: The paper examines how the absence of a robust security infrastructure has led to increased internal conflicts and threats from various insurgent groups. The lack of effective policing and military oversight has exacerbated the security vacuum, leading to widespread instability.
Administrative Challenges: The study delves into the administrative issues plaguing the country, such as corruption, inefficiency, and the absence of skilled personnel in critical sectors. These problems are compounded by the international community's hesitance to engage directly with the Taliban-led government, resulting in limited foreign aid and support.
Humanitarian and Developmental Issues: The paper also addresses the dire humanitarian situation, marked by poverty, displacement, and lack of access to essential services like healthcare and education. The economic downturn, exacerbated by sanctions and the cessation of international aid, has led to a crisis situation with severe implications for the civilian population.

The research methodology includes interviews with local officials, international experts on Afghan politics, and analysis of secondary data from international organizations. The findings indicate a critical need for establishing a more inclusive government that can address the myriad challenges facing the state.
Conclusion
The study concludes that Afghanistan's current governance crisis requires urgent international attention and cooperation. Recommendations include the need for a structured international engagement strategy that does not compromise on human rights and governance standards. The research underscores the importance of building a governance framework that is inclusive, transparent, and capable of addressing the complex socio-economic challenges faced by the country.
Overall, this detailed analysis provides insights into the challenges of rebuilding state capacity in Afghanistan under the Taliban's rule. It highlights the urgent need for comprehensive strategies to stabilize the country and ensure a sustainable future for its people.
Keywords

Fathollah-Nejad, A., & Azizi, H. (2021). Iran and the Taliban after the US fiasco in Afghanistan. Middle East Institute, September 22, 2021.
Bharti, S. S. (2022). Confronting Afghanistan’s security and development challenges: A contribution of the European Union. Geopolitics Quarterly, 18(68), 151-176.
Bizhan, N. (2018). Building legitimacy and state capacity in protracted fragility: The case of Afghanistan. London: The LSE-Oxford Commission on State Fragility, Growth, and Development.
Bolourchi, N. (2021). Iran’s strategy in Afghanistan: Pragmatic engagement with the Taliban. Newlines Institute.
Boys, J. D. (2022). Strategic ambiguity: The U.S. grand strategy initiative in Afghanistan. Policy Studies, 43(6), 1216-1234.
European Commission. (2015). Evaluation of EU support to gender equality and women’s empowerment in partner countries. Final report, Volume 1: Main report, April 2015. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
Hilpold, P. (2014). Responsibility to protect (R2P): A new paradigm of international law? Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
Kamrava, M. (2016). Fragile politics: Weak states in the Greater Middle East. Oxford University Press.
Manchanda, N. (2017). Afghanistan: The production of a ‘failed’ state. Politics: Special Issues, 15th October 2017. Retrieved from Politics Blog.
Medea, B. (2022). The Taliban or a failed state? Helping to prevent the Afghan economy from collapsing is in the interest of Afghans, the region, and the United States as well. FPIF, August 9.
Pate, A. (2019). The challenges of terrorism in a globalized world. In J. L. Black, M. Johns, & A. D. Theriault (Eds.), The new world disorder: Challenges and threats in an uncertain world (pp. 189-206). London: Lexington Books.
Patrick, S. (2011). Weak links: Fragile states, global threats, and international security. Oxford University Press.
Rotberg, R. I. (2003). Failed states, collapsed states, weak states: Causes and indicators. In State failure and state weakness in a time of terror (pp. 25-50). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Said, N. W. (2013). Failed or fragile states in international power politics. Master’s thesis for International Affairs at the City College of New York.
Stavrinou, R., & Waller, N. (2020). The EU needs an Afghanistan policy. New Europe. Retrieved from New Europe.
The United Nations. (2020b). The Sustainable Development Agenda 2030. The United Nations. Retrieved from United Nations.
Tookhy, F. (2022). Iran’s response to the Taliban’s comeback in Afghanistan. United States Institute of Peace, August.
United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA). (2020). Afghanistan: 10,000 civilian casualties for sixth straight year. United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan. Retrieved from UNAMA.
Verma, R. (2022). US-Taliban peace deal and regional powers as potential spoilers: Iran as a case study. Int Polit, 59, 260–279.
Fund for Peace (July 30, 2020). Indicators. Fund for Peace. Retrieved from Fund for Peace.
Fund for Peace (July 30, 2023). Indicators. Fund for Peace. Retrieved from Fund for Peace.
Fund for Peace-FFP (July 30, 2020). Who we are? Fund for Peace. Retrieved from Fund for Peace.
International Crisis Group (2017). Afghanistan: Growing challenges. International Crisis Group. Retrieved from Crisis Group.
Fars News Agency. (2021). Members of the Taliban Cabinet and Their Ethnic Backgrounds in Afghanistan. September 10, 2021 {in Persian}.
Office for the Preservation and Publication of the Works of Ayatollah Khamenei. (2021). Supreme Leader's Speech at the First Meeting with the President and Members of the 13th Government. September 6, 2021 {in Persian}.
Diyarān. (2023). {in Persian}.
Last Statistics on Migration from Afghanistan to Iran (First Half of 2023). (2023). September 29, 2023 {in Persian}.
Safavi, S. Y., Islami, A., & Kiakajouri, K. (2023). Neo-Talibanism in Afghanistan and Iran’s National Security. Fundamental and Applied Studies of the Islamic World, 5(3), 119-143 {in Persian}.
Abbaszadeh Marzbali, M., & Talashi-Kalti, K. (2022). The Taliban and the Recovery of Sovereignty: Strong Movement, Weak Nation-State. Fundamental and Applied Studies of the Islamic World, 2(5), 105-130 {in Persian}.
 
 
.