The Islamic Revolution Approach

The Islamic Revolution Approach

Scientific Diplomacy as the Future Axis of the Soft Power of the Islamic Republic of Iran: A Trend and Scenario-Based Analysis

Authors
Maryam Sarbazi
Morteza Abazari,
Bahram Montazeri
Department of Political Science, Shahr-e Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahr-e Qods, Iran
Abstract
Scientific diplomacy has increasingly emerged as a strategic instrument of soft power in contemporary international relations. This article examines scientific diplomacy as a potential future axis of the soft power of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The main research question asks how scientific diplomacy can evolve into a central pillar of Iran’s regional soft power and what alternative future scenarios can be envisioned for its development. Using a qualitative and futures-oriented approach, the study applies trend analysis and James Dator’s four futures framework to explore possible trajectories. The findings indicate that Iran’s scientific diplomacy faces four plausible scenarios: continued growth, collapse, re-creation, and fundamental transformation. The preferred scenario combines sustained growth with adaptive re-creation, supported by strategic investment in emerging technologies and regional scientific cooperation. Such a pathway could enhance Iran’s regional legitimacy, generate positive scientific interdependencies, and consolidate its position within the regional architecture of soft power.
 
Introduction
The contemporary international system has undergone profound transformations in the nature and sources of power. Power is no longer derived solely from military capabilities or economic resources; intangible elements such as knowledge, culture, legitimacy, and technology now play a decisive role. Within this evolving context, soft power has become a central concept in foreign policy analysis, emphasizing attraction rather than coercion. Scientific diplomacy has emerged as one of the most dynamic instruments of soft power, linking scientific cooperation, technological exchange, and elite networking with broader diplomatic objectives. For the Islamic Republic of Iran, scientific diplomacy offers a particularly significant opportunity. Iran possesses notable scientific and technological capacities in areas such as nanotechnology, biotechnology, medicine, aerospace, and unmanned aerial systems. At the same time, the country faces structural challenges including international sanctions, restricted academic collaboration, and brain drain. These conditions make it essential to adopt a forward-looking analytical framework capable of identifying both opportunities and risks. This study addresses the central question of how scientific diplomacy can become the future axis of Iran’s soft power and what scenarios may shape its evolution in the coming years.
Materials and Methods
This research employs a qualitative and futures-oriented methodology. Data were collected through library and documentary research, including academic literature on soft power, smart power, scientific diplomacy, and Iranian foreign policy, as well as policy documents and analytical reports. The study integrates two complementary analytical tools.
First, it draws on the concept of smart power, which emphasizes the strategic combination of hard and soft power resources. Within this framework, scientific diplomacy is understood as a bridge between technological capability and cultural–ideational attraction. Second, the study applies futures studies methods, particularly trend analysis and James Dator’s four futures framework. This model conceptualizes the future as a set of alternative pathways rather than a single linear trajectory, consisting of continued growth, collapse, re-creation, and fundamental transformation. By identifying key trends, drivers, and uncertainties, the research constructs plausible scenarios for the future of Iran’s scientific diplomacy.
Discussion
Trend analysis reveals several structural forces shaping Iran’s scientific diplomacy. On the global level, the internationalization of science and the expansion of transnational research networks have increased the political significance of knowledge production. Scientific achievement now functions as a marker of credibility and legitimacy in regional and global arenas. Concurrently, intensified technological competition among major powers has transformed science and innovation into strategic assets.
Regionally, the Middle East has witnessed growing investment in higher education, research infrastructure, and knowledge-based branding, particularly by countries such as Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar. This has generated a competitive environment in which scientific diplomacy plays a key role in shaping regional influence. Iran’s scientific achievements position it as a potential regional hub, yet sanctions and institutional fragmentation limit its ability to fully capitalize on these assets.
Based on these trends, four scenarios are identified. In the continued growth scenario, Iran sustains its current trajectory of scientific development, expands international academic cooperation, and strengthens its reputation as a knowledge-producing country. In the collapse scenario, intensified sanctions, academic isolation, and accelerated brain drain undermine scientific capacity and erode Iran’s soft power. The re-creation scenario envisions a strategic reorientation toward regional and South–South scientific cooperation, transforming constraints into opportunities for indigenous innovation and regional leadership. Finally, the fundamental transformation scenario assumes that breakthroughs in emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence or advanced biotechnology, fundamentally reshape Iran’s scientific diplomacy and blur the boundary between soft and hard power.
Conclusion
The study concludes that the future of Iran’s scientific diplomacy is inherently non-linear and contingent upon strategic choices and external conditions. Among the four scenarios, the preferred pathway combines elements of continued growth and re-creation, with selective aspects of fundamental transformation. In this scenario, Iran maintains scientific momentum, reconfigures its diplomatic networks toward regional and Islamic partners, and invests strategically in emerging technologies. Such an approach would enhance Iran’s regional legitimacy, create positive scientific interdependencies, and reinforce its image as a reliable scientific partner. More broadly, the findings demonstrate that scientific diplomacy should not be treated as a peripheral policy tool but as a central pillar of Iran’s soft power strategy. Effective coordination among scientific institutions, diplomatic bodies, and technological sectors is essential for translating scientific capacity into sustainable soft power and long-term regional influence.
 
 
Keywords
Scientific Diplomacy
Soft Power
Futures Studies
Scenario Planning
Islamic Republic of Iran
Akbar, A. (2021). Iran’s soft power in Syria after the Syrian civil war. Mediterranean Politics, 28(2), 227–249.
Akbar, A. (2023). Iran’s soft power in the Middle East via the promotion of the Persian language. Contemporary Politics, 29(4), 424–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2023.2169305
Akbarzadeh, S., Ahmed, Z. S., & Ibrahimi, N. (2021). Soft power, hard power dynamics: the case of Iran in Afghanistan. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 50(1), 67–86.
Ali Akbar (2023) Iran’s soft power in the Middle East via the promotion of the Persian language, Contemporary Politics, 29:4, 424-445.
Baldwin, David (1985), Economic, Statecraft, Princeton University Press.
Dousti, A., Saboonchi, R., & Sabzi, Z. (2023). Identification of Strategic Elements of Sports Diplomacy based on Soft Power in Expanding Iran's International Relations with Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. Journal of World Sociopolitical Studies, 7(2), 317-352.
Eslami, M., & Vysotskaya Guedes Vieira, A. (Eds.). (2023). The arms race in the Middle East: Contemporary security dynamics (1st ed.). Springer.
Inayatullah, S. (2008). Six pillars: Futures thinking for transforming. Foresight, 10(1), 4–21.
Inayatullah, S. (2015). Intuiting the Future (s). Journal of Futures Studies, 20(1), 115-118.
Melissen, J. (2005). The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations.
Moed, H. F. (2016). Iran’s scientific dominance and the emergence of South-East Asian countries as scientific collaborators in the Persian Gulf Region. Scientometrics, 108(1), 305-314.
Moed, H. F. (2016). Iran’s scientific dominance and the emergence of South-East Asian countries as scientific collaborators in the Persian Gulf Region. Scientometrics, 108(1), 305-314
Nye, Joseph (1990), “The Misleading Metaphor of Decline”, the Atlantic Monthly, March 1990.
Nye, Joseph (1991), Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American power, New York, Basic Books, 1991
Nye, Joseph (2004), “Ignoring Soft Power”, Chicago Tribune, 16 Mai 2004.
Nye, Joseph (2004), Soft Power. The Means to Success in World Politics, New York: Public Affairs; (2011), The Future of Power, New York: Public Affairs.
sti, M., Saboonchi, S., & Sabzi, R. (2023). Iran’s Drone Diplomacy: Expanding Soft Power Through Technology. International Relations Journal, 29(4), 74-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2023.2139077
Sweeney, J. A., & Rhisiart, M. (2012). Exploring the future through inner space: A review of the methodological and philosophical elements of integral futures. Futures, 44(4), 277–288.
 
References [In Persian]
Abbasi, K., Ghaem-Panah, S., Shamsini Ghiasvand, H., & Ataeri, S. A. S. (2023). The impact of soft power on the national security of the Islamic Republic of Iran from the perspective of Ayatollah Khamenei: Thematic dimensions. Political and International Studies, 14(54), 24–49. (in Persian)
Afrakhteh, A. H., & Norouzi, Z. (2020). The effectiveness of rituals and ceremonies on the soft power of the Islamic Revolution of Iran (With emphasis on Ashura culture). Islamic Revolution Approach Quarterly, 14(50), 23–44. (in Persian)
Ahmadian, A. A., Sharifan, M. A., & Poursadegh, N. (2018). Strategies for developing the use of unmanned aerial vehicles to enhance the combat power of the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Strategic Defense Studies Quarterly, 16(72), 153–176. (in Persian)
Akbar, A. (2021). Iran’s soft power in Syria after the Syrian civil war. Mediterranean Politics, 28(2), 227–249.
Akbar, A. (2023). Iran’s soft power in the Middle East via the promotion of the Persian language. Contemporary Politics, 29(4), 424–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2023.2169305
Akbarzadeh, S., Ahmed, Z. S., & Ibrahimi, N. (2021). Soft power, hard power dynamics: the case of Iran in Afghanistan. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 50(1), 67–86.
Ali Akbar (2023) Iran’s soft power in the Middle East via the promotion of the Persian language, Contemporary Politics, 29:4, 424-445.
Alipour, J., & Mirzajani, M. (2023). Soft power and deterrence: A case study of the missile capability of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Scientific Quarterly of Soft Power Studies, 13(2), 229–247. (in Persian)
Baldwin, David (1985), Economic, Statecraft, Princeton University Press.
Dousti, A., Saboonchi, R., & Sabzi, Z. (2023). Identification of Strategic Elements of Sports Diplomacy based on Soft Power in Expanding Iran's International Relations with Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. Journal of World Sociopolitical Studies, 7(2), 317-352.
Eftekhari, A. (2016). Soft power: Instruments of success in international politics (S. M. Rouhani, Trans.). Imam Sadegh University Press. (in Persian)
Eslami, M., & Vysotskaya Guedes Vieira, A. (Eds.). (2023). The arms race in the Middle East: Contemporary security dynamics (1st ed.). Springer.
Ghorbani Sheikhneshin, A., Karami, K., & Abbaszadeh, H. (2011). Smart power: A new approach to power in the era of globalization. Foreign Relations Quarterly, 3(4), 125–150. (in Persian)
Inayatullah, S. (2008). Six pillars: Futures thinking for transforming. Foresight, 10(1), 4–21.
Inayatullah, S. (2015). Intuiting the Future (s). Journal of Futures Studies, 20(1), 115-118.
Jadidi, A., Nasiri, S., & Barzin, S. S. (2021). Sources of the soft power of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Iraq (2010–2020). Soft Power Studies Quarterly, 12(4), 29–54. (in Persian)
Ketabi, A., & Ghavi, N. (2023). The Islamic Revolution’s initiative in fostering unity and cohesion of the Muslim Ummah as soft power in confronting enemies. Soft Power Studies, 13(3), 25–50. (in Persian)
Kouhkan, M., & Bashir, H. (2020). Scientific diplomacy as soft power: From global experiences to an indigenous model. Political Research of the Islamic World, 10(4), 71–103. (in Persian)
Kouhkan, M., & Bashir, H. (2020). Scientific diplomacy as soft power: From global experiences to an indigenous model. Political Research of the Islamic World, 10(4), 71–103. (in Persian)
Melissen, J. (2005). The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations.
Moed, H. F. (2016). Iran’s scientific dominance and the emergence of South-East Asian countries as scientific collaborators in the Persian Gulf Region. Scientometrics, 108(1), 305-314.
Moed, H. F. (2016). Iran’s scientific dominance and the emergence of South-East Asian countries as scientific collaborators in the Persian Gulf Region. Scientometrics, 108(1), 305-314
Mohseni Sahi, H. S., & Mohseni Sahi, F. S. (2015). The impact of science and technology diplomacy on enhancing the soft power of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Management in Islamic University, 4(1), 9–29. (in Persian)
Mousavi Zare, S. J., Zargani, S. H., & Amirfakhrian, M. (2022). An analysis of the role of military capability in the soft power of states. Geopolitics Quarterly, 18(1), 44–71. (in Persian)
Nye, Joseph (1990), “The Misleading Metaphor of Decline”, the Atlantic Monthly, March 1990.
Nye, Joseph (1991), Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American power, New York, Basic Books, 1991
Nye, Joseph (2004), “Ignoring Soft Power”, Chicago Tribune, 16 Mai 2004.
Nye, Joseph (2004), Soft Power. The Means to Success in World Politics, New York: Public Affairs; (2011), The Future of Power, New York: Public Affairs.
Rahmani Tirkolaei, H. (2023). Cultural diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran as soft power. Scientific Quarterly of Soft Power Studies, 13(3), 51–66. (in Persian)
Rahmani, T., & Ganjkhanlou, M. (2024). Rereading the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran from the perspective of transforming ideology into an actual source of soft power. Soft Power Studies, 14(1), 35–58. (in Persian)
Rashad, M., & Rashad, A. (2023). Soft power and asymmetric action in Iran’s strategic policy. Political Studies Quarterly, 15(4), 89–112. (in Persian)
sti, M., Saboonchi, S., & Sabzi, R. (2023). Iran’s Drone Diplomacy: Expanding Soft Power Through Technology. International Relations Journal, 29(4), 74-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2023.2139077
Sweeney, J. A., & Rhisiart, M. (2012). Exploring the future through inner space: A review of the methodological and philosophical elements of integral futures. Futures, 44(4), 277–288.
Zargar, A., & Molaei, A. (2022). Components of the soft power of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Iraq with emphasis on Shiʿa Kurds. Soft Power Studies, 13(29), 115–138. (in Persian)