The Islamic Revolution Approach

The Islamic Revolution Approach

Just War in the Political Thought of Al-Farabi

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD student, Department of Political Science, Khorramabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorramabad, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Khorramabad branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorramabad, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Khorramabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorramabad, Iran
Abstract
Introduction
The concept of justice and ethics in warfare has been a prominent topic in Islamic thought, and numerous Muslim thinkers have explored this subject. One of the most notable among them is Al-Farabi, a leading Islamic philosopher and a founder of Islamic political philosophy. Through his theory of the Virtuous City, Al-Farabi outlined foundational principles for human societies in which goodness, justice, and virtue stand as core values. This paper aims to examine Al-Farabi's perspective on "just war" through the lens of his political philosophy. The primary question of this research is: How does Al-Farabi justify the concept of just war? Does his acceptance of the concept imply the existence of unjust wars?
Questions and Hypotheses

From Al-Farabi’s perspective, what qualifies a war as just?
What are Al-Farabi’s criteria for distinguishing just from unjust wars?
Does Al-Farabi view war as a legitimate tool for expanding political power and influence?

The main hypothesis of this study is that Al-Farabi considers war justifiable only under certain conditions, as a means to achieve good and justice. Any war aimed at personal gain, conquest, or the expansion of power, however, is deemed unjust by Al-Farabi.
Research Methodology
This study is based on a library-based examination of primary and secondary sources, focusing on Al-Farabi’s works such as The Opinions of the People of the Virtuous City and various interpretations of his thought. The approach employed here is descriptive-analytical, supported by hermeneutic interpretation of Al-Farabi’s texts to elucidate his foundational principles on the just and unjust nature of war.
Main Body

The Concept of Justice and Goodness in Al-Farabi’s Thought

Al-Farabi holds that justice is one of the foundational values necessary to create an ideal society. In his view, the "Virtuous City" is a society in which justice and goodness reign supreme, and citizens strive toward achieving virtue and perfection. For this reason, Al-Farabi views any action, including war, as justifiable only if it serves to establish justice and promote the common good.

War in Islamic Thought and Al-Farabi’s Perspective

In Islamic thought, war has consistently been seen as a last resort, acceptable only for resisting oppression and tyranny. Islam’s ethical principles endorse war solely under circumstances that defend human rights and eradicate sedition and aggression. In Al-Farabi’s view, war is considered just only if it aims to protect individuals from oppression and to secure public good. He categorically rejects any war waged for revenge, territorial conquest, or material gain. In other words, Al-Farabi holds that war must be a means to create a better and more just society rather than a tool for personal or group advantage.

Criteria for Just and Unjust Wars in Al-Farabi’s Thought

Al-Farabi provides clear criteria for distinguishing just wars from unjust ones. According to him, war is only justified if it is aimed at achieving goodness and justice. These criteria include respecting the lives of citizens, preventing cruelty, and establishing justice in society. Al-Farabi insists that war must solely be waged against oppression and corruption and should ultimately foster peace and security for all citizens.

War as a Tool for Advancing Virtue in Society

Al-Farabi views war not only as a defensive measure but also as a potential tool for advancing virtue and the public good. He argues that if a society is at risk of losing justice and virtue, then a war aimed at restoring these values can be deemed necessary and beneficial. For this reason, Al-Farabi differentiates between just and unjust wars, supporting only those that benefit the general public and uphold justice and virtue.
Conclusion
Al-Farabi’s theory of just war presents a moral and philosophical framework wherein war is permissible only as a means to establish justice, eliminate oppression, and secure the common good. According to Al-Farabi, any war conducted for the sake of personal gain, expansion of power, or ambition is inherently unjust. He introduces this theory as part of his philosophy of the Virtuous City, where he emphasizes the importance of the goal and purpose of war in determining its moral validity. In Al-Farabi's thought, a just war must be directed toward promoting, distributing, and ensuring virtue and welfare; otherwise, it devolves into an unjust war.
Keywords

آزاد ارمکی ،تقی(1393) .اندیشه اجتماعی متفکران مسلمان از فارابی تا ابن خلدون. تهران: انتشارات صدا و سیما.
اشرفی، ابولفضل و حسینی، سیدعلی اکبر(1396)، بررسی و تحلیل محتوای جنگ، جهاد و پرورش نظامی در قرآن با تأکید برمقایسه با ادیان یهودیت، مسیحیت و زردشت، فصلنامه مدیریت نظامی، شماره3
آگوستین قدیس(1391).شهر خدا. ترجمة حسین توفیقی، قم:دانشگاه ادیان و مذاهب.
امامی کوپایی، امیر حسین، عدالت نژاد، سعید و نجف زاده، رضا(1398). سنجه فلسفی جهاد: فارابی، فصلنامه تاریخ و تمدن اسلامی،30،ص 33-69.
امامی کوپایی،امیر حسین،1400،نظریه جنگ عادلانه فارابی،تاریخ تمدن اسلامی،ش 36،صص95-128.
باقری سعید، حقیقت سید صادق (1392). نظریة جنگ عادلانه در فلسفة سیاسی سنت اگوستین. پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی،تهران
حمید الله ،محمد(1373).حقوق روابط بین الملل در اسلام. ترجمه : سید مصطفی محقق داماد، تهران: انتشارات علوم اسلامی.
سوادی، عصمت و همکاران(1402) واکاوی عقلی مفهوم جهاد از دیدگاه فارابی، فصلنامه علمی کاوش های عقلی، شماره 2،صفحه 136-159.
سیاوشی ،کرم(1386)، قرآن مکّى و مدنى از نگاه سید قطب،ویژه نامه قرآن وخانواده،شماره 49 و50.
شیرودی،آزاده و کاشانی ،محمد،1397،اخلاق جنگ(حقوق بشر دوستانه) در اسلام و مسیحیت،قم،نشر موسسه بوستان کتاب
فارابی،محمد بن محمد(1382).فصول المنتزعه، ترجمه: حسن ملکشاهی.تهران: انتشارات سروش.
فیضی، م. (1402). صلح عادلانه و جنگ عادلانه و بررسی مبانی و شاخص‌های هر یک. سی و هفتمین کنفرانس بین‌المللی وحدت اسلامی
قاسمی، علی و چهار بخش ،ویکتور بارین(1398)، مسیحیت و حقوق توسل به زور،فصلنامه دیدگاه های حقوقی،دانشکده علوم قضایی و خدمات اداری،ش 49 و 50، صفحه 35-49.
لنگهاوزن،محمد(1387)، «اسلام و نظریه جنگ عادلانه»، اندیشه دینی، شماره 26.
محقق داماد، سید مصطفی (1383)، حقوق بشردوستانه بین المللی،رهیافت اسلامی، تهران: مرکـزنشـرعلـوم اسلامی.
مدد پور ،محمد،1398،کلیسای مسیح و ادوار تاریخ،آبادان،نشر پرسش.
مهدویان، علیرضا، افتخاری، اصغر(1397)، «شاخص های جنگ عادلانه در سیره نظامی امیرالمؤمنین (ع)»، فصلنامه مطالعات تاریخ اسلام، سال دهم، شماره 38،  صفحه 187-161.
نساج، حمید، بحرانی، مرتضی، (1395). جنگ و صلح در اندیشه سیاسی فارابی، نشریه پژوهش های دفاعی امنیتی اسلام،شماره 2 ، صفحه 143 - 164.
نیکنام ابرکوه، بهناز(1395)، « دکترین مسولیت حمایت : ارتقاء حقوق بشر یا جنگ عادلانه»، فصلنامه سیاست خارجی، دوره 30، شماره 3، صفحه 29-6.
 
Walzer, M. (1977). Just and unjust wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations. Basic Books.
Akhavan Kazemi, B. (2006). Evaluation of Hermeneutics Application in Islamic Political Research. Quarterly Journal of Politics, Faculty of Law and Political Science, (4), 55-76.
Al-Farabi, M. B. M. (2003). Fusul al-Muntaza (H. Malekshahi, Trans.). Tehran: Soroush Publications.
Amiri, Z. (2021). Definition of Just Peace and Just War and Analysis of Their Foundations and Criteria. Retrieved from http://www.taghrib.org/fa/article/.
Ashrafi, A., & Hosseini, S. A. (2017). Analysis of War, Jihad, and Military Training in the Quran, with a Comparative Approach to Abrahamic Religions (Judaism, Christianity, Zoroastrianism). Quarterly Journal of Military Management, (3), 68-103.